<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 47 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438473</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of the appellant in an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The court held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in disregarding the remand report provided by the Assessing Officer, which highlighted crucial aspects related to stock valuation and inspection by the bank. Additionally, the court ruled that the revenue authority failed to prove undisclosed income with concrete evidence, leading to an erroneous addition based on inadequate assessment of stock valuation. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal and set aside the assessment orders in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 47 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438473</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of the appellant in an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The court held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in disregarding the remand report provided by the Assessing Officer, which highlighted crucial aspects related to stock valuation and inspection by the bank. Additionally, the court ruled that the revenue authority failed to prove undisclosed income with concrete evidence, leading to an erroneous addition based on inadequate assessment of stock valuation. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal and set aside the assessment orders in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>