<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 44 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438470</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Raipur. The Tribunal found the dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution by the CIT(Appeals) unjust, emphasizing the obligation to consider all issues and decide on merits. The order of the CIT(Appeals) was set aside, and the matter was restored for a de novo appellate proceeding, granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 08:07:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 44 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438470</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Raipur. The Tribunal found the dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution by the CIT(Appeals) unjust, emphasizing the obligation to consider all issues and decide on merits. The order of the CIT(Appeals) was set aside, and the matter was restored for a de novo appellate proceeding, granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>