<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Sabka Vishwas Scheme: Tax Dues Classified as Arrears After Withdrawal of Pending Litigation for Final Duty Demand.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70065</link>
    <description>Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) (SVLDR) Scheme - classification of “tax dues” under the “arrears category” - once the pending litigation had been withdrawn, the demand of duty raised by the tax authorities attained “finality” and a fortiori fell under the definition of “amount in arrears” and the declaration was rightly considered under the “arrears” category. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 08:06:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 08:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Sabka Vishwas Scheme: Tax Dues Classified as Arrears After Withdrawal of Pending Litigation for Final Duty Demand.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70065</link>
      <description>Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) (SVLDR) Scheme - classification of “tax dues” under the “arrears category” - once the pending litigation had been withdrawn, the demand of duty raised by the tax authorities attained “finality” and a fortiori fell under the definition of “amount in arrears” and the declaration was rightly considered under the “arrears” category. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 08:06:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>