<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1646 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308123</link>
    <description>The petitioner was covered by a departmental circular issued in relation to the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, and the parties recorded that coverage on the basis of the circular dated 29.10.2019. As no live controversy remained for adjudication after that administrative relief, the writ petition was treated as infructuous and disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 20:34:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1646 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308123</link>
      <description>The petitioner was covered by a departmental circular issued in relation to the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, and the parties recorded that coverage on the basis of the circular dated 29.10.2019. As no live controversy remained for adjudication after that administrative relief, the writ petition was treated as infructuous and disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>