https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308127 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the High Court's refusal to review its earlier order, the validity of land acquisition by the Bangalore Development Authority, and alleged suppression of material facts by the Appellants. The Court held that the Appellants' failure to disclose earlier litigation constituted suppression of material facts, disqualifying them from seeking relief under Article 226. The Court affirmed that full disclosure is essential in such cases. Additionally, the Court upheld previous judgments confirming the legality of the land acquisition and allotment. The appeals were dismissed without costs. en-us Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 May 2023 20:34:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308127 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the High Court's refusal to review its earlier order, the validity of land acquisition by the Bangalore Development Authority, and alleged suppression of material facts by the Appellants. The Court held that the Appellants' failure to disclose earlier litigation constituted suppression of material facts, disqualifying them from seeking relief under Article 226. The Court affirmed that full disclosure is essential in such cases. Additionally, the Court upheld previous judgments confirming the legality of the land acquisition and allotment. The appeals were dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308127