<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1193 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438386</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the demand for Service Tax on business auxiliary services related to the sale of Black Tea in foreign countries was not sustainable. It ruled that Black Tea falls under the definition of &quot;agricultural produce&quot; in the exemption notification and that the processes involved in manufacturing Black Tea do not change its essential characteristics. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order upholding the Service Tax demand, allowing the appeal with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1193 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438386</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the demand for Service Tax on business auxiliary services related to the sale of Black Tea in foreign countries was not sustainable. It ruled that Black Tea falls under the definition of &quot;agricultural produce&quot; in the exemption notification and that the processes involved in manufacturing Black Tea do not change its essential characteristics. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order upholding the Service Tax demand, allowing the appeal with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>