<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1192 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438385</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the delay condonation application, subject to payment of a cost, thereby condoning the delay. The appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was dismissed by the Tribunal due to non-compliance with Section 35-F regarding pre-deposit. The High Court set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal to revive before the Tribunal for a hearing on merits upon payment of the cost and pre-deposit amount by a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 09:43:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1192 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438385</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the delay condonation application, subject to payment of a cost, thereby condoning the delay. The appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was dismissed by the Tribunal due to non-compliance with Section 35-F regarding pre-deposit. The High Court set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal to revive before the Tribunal for a hearing on merits upon payment of the cost and pre-deposit amount by a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>