<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1385 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308104</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling that the capital gains from the Joint Development Agreement (JDA) dated 07.05.2009 were not taxable in the assessment year 2010-11. The Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to calculate the capital gains as long-term capital gains and upheld the addition for the disallowance of 25% of development expenses. Ground No. 12 was dismissed, while ground Nos. 2 and 13 were not adjudicated due to lack of argumentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 21:08:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1385 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308104</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling that the capital gains from the Joint Development Agreement (JDA) dated 07.05.2009 were not taxable in the assessment year 2010-11. The Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to calculate the capital gains as long-term capital gains and upheld the addition for the disallowance of 25% of development expenses. Ground No. 12 was dismissed, while ground Nos. 2 and 13 were not adjudicated due to lack of argumentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>