<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 3 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32866</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision that the principle of mutuality did not apply to the assessee-company due to its commercial activities and discretionary contributions from YRIPL. The excess income over expenditure of Rs 44,44,002/- was deemed taxable as the activities were found to have a commercial purpose. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower authorities&#039; findings that were not considered perverse, with no substantial question of law raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 3 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32866</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision that the principle of mutuality did not apply to the assessee-company due to its commercial activities and discretionary contributions from YRIPL. The excess income over expenditure of Rs 44,44,002/- was deemed taxable as the activities were found to have a commercial purpose. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower authorities&#039; findings that were not considered perverse, with no substantial question of law raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>