<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1371 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308079</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) as the applicant was deemed ineligible under Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The classification of the applicant as a wilful defaulter by Union Bank of India was found to be in accordance with regulatory guidelines. Consequently, the application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 09:01:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1371 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308079</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) as the applicant was deemed ineligible under Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The classification of the applicant as a wilful defaulter by Union Bank of India was found to be in accordance with regulatory guidelines. Consequently, the application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>