<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1364 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308086</link>
    <description>A commission agent&#039;s bank deposits could not be treated as its turnover for attracting the audit requirement under section 44AB where the assessee only earned commission on milk product sales. On those facts, the assessee was not liable to tax audit, so the foundation for penalty under section 271B failed. The penalty was therefore held unsustainable and deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 09:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1364 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308086</link>
      <description>A commission agent&#039;s bank deposits could not be treated as its turnover for attracting the audit requirement under section 44AB where the assessee only earned commission on milk product sales. On those facts, the assessee was not liable to tax audit, so the foundation for penalty under section 271B failed. The penalty was therefore held unsustainable and deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>