<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1166 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding that none of the charges against the appellant were proved. The revocation of the license and forfeiture of the security deposit were deemed unwarranted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 09:00:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1166 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding that none of the charges against the appellant were proved. The revocation of the license and forfeiture of the security deposit were deemed unwarranted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>