https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438348 Writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked where an efficacious statutory appeal is available under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and challenges to provisional attachment or confirmation orders should be taken before the appellate forum. The commentary also notes that provisional attachment under Section 5(1) may be made on reason to believe that proceeds of crime may be concealed, transferred, or dealt with so as to frustrate confiscation, and that the provision does not require prior notice or a pre-attachment hearing. The adjudicatory scheme under Section 8 allows affected persons to place their materials before the statutory authority. en-us Tue, 11 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 May 2023 08:59:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438348 Writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked where an efficacious statutory appeal is available under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and challenges to provisional attachment or confirmation orders should be taken before the appellate forum. The commentary also notes that provisional attachment under Section 5(1) may be made on reason to believe that proceeds of crime may be concealed, transferred, or dealt with so as to frustrate confiscation, and that the provision does not require prior notice or a pre-attachment hearing. The adjudicatory scheme under Section 8 allows affected persons to place their materials before the statutory authority. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 11 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438348