<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1148 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438341</link>
    <description>Where duty arose from provisional assessment, the differential duty had to be worked out on finalisation of that assessment, and a demand under the general recovery provision was premature. The Tribunal treated the amount deposited under protest as recoverable only through the final assessment process, and held that interest and penalty could not survive once the underlying demand failed. It also noted that the statutory provision for interest on finalisation of provisional assessment was introduced later and could not apply retrospectively to the disputed period. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was directed to proceed in accordance with finalisation of provisional assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 May 2023 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1148 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438341</link>
      <description>Where duty arose from provisional assessment, the differential duty had to be worked out on finalisation of that assessment, and a demand under the general recovery provision was premature. The Tribunal treated the amount deposited under protest as recoverable only through the final assessment process, and held that interest and penalty could not survive once the underlying demand failed. It also noted that the statutory provision for interest on finalisation of provisional assessment was introduced later and could not apply retrospectively to the disputed period. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was directed to proceed in accordance with finalisation of provisional assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>