<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 206 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32852</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, remanded the case involving automobile dealers providing space to financiers back to the Original Authority for reevaluation. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the appellants to provide documentary evidence to establish that the amounts received were rent for space, not commission for promoting financiers&#039; business. While the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the Service Tax demand but set aside the penalty, the question of penalty imposition was left open for future determination. The Tribunal allowed the appeals via remand, directing a thorough examination of the Service Tax liability within four months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 206 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32852</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, remanded the case involving automobile dealers providing space to financiers back to the Original Authority for reevaluation. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the appellants to provide documentary evidence to establish that the amounts received were rent for space, not commission for promoting financiers&#039; business. While the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the Service Tax demand but set aside the penalty, the question of penalty imposition was left open for future determination. The Tribunal allowed the appeals via remand, directing a thorough examination of the Service Tax liability within four months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>