<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1122 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438315</link>
    <description>The HC examined an inter-state GST transaction involving an expired E-way bill. The court found procedural irregularities in tax and penalty imposition without evidence of tax evasion. Directing the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) to expeditiously process the petitioner&#039;s appeal within eight weeks, the HC emphasized proper assessment before penalizing and upheld the statutory right to challenge the order through alternative remedy under Section 107 of JGST Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1122 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438315</link>
      <description>The HC examined an inter-state GST transaction involving an expired E-way bill. The court found procedural irregularities in tax and penalty imposition without evidence of tax evasion. Directing the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) to expeditiously process the petitioner&#039;s appeal within eight weeks, the HC emphasized proper assessment before penalizing and upheld the statutory right to challenge the order through alternative remedy under Section 107 of JGST Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>