https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32843 In an appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, the High Court held that concurrent factual findings on the genuineness of the will and ownership of assets did not give rise to any substantial question of law. The Tribunal had examined the evidence, accepted that the deceased had independent income, rejected the allegation that assets in family members' names were benami holdings of the assessee, and relied on probate of the will as supporting ownership in the deceased. As no perversity in those findings was shown, interference was unwarranted and the Tribunal's conclusions were left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32843 In an appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, the High Court held that concurrent factual findings on the genuineness of the will and ownership of assets did not give rise to any substantial question of law. The Tribunal had examined the evidence, accepted that the deceased had independent income, rejected the allegation that assets in family members' names were benami holdings of the assessee, and relied on probate of the will as supporting ownership in the deceased. As no perversity in those findings was shown, interference was unwarranted and the Tribunal's conclusions were left undisturbed. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32843