https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438271 The appeal by the directors was dismissed for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedures Rule, 1982. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed on merits, in line with the decisions of the High Courts that invalidated Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, as unconstitutional, due to unreasonable restrictions on defaulters. en-us Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 May 2023 09:31:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438271 The appeal by the directors was dismissed for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedures Rule, 1982. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed on merits, in line with the decisions of the High Courts that invalidated Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, as unconstitutional, due to unreasonable restrictions on defaulters. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438271