<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1072 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438265</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision regarding the legitimacy of the gold seizure by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) and the provisional release of the seized gold under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962. The court allowed the Review Petition, extending the same provisional release terms to the 25299.68 grams of gold jewelry as applied to the other seized gold, with the Bank Guarantee enhanced to Rs. 15 crores.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 May 2023 09:31:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1072 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438265</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision regarding the legitimacy of the gold seizure by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) and the provisional release of the seized gold under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962. The court allowed the Review Petition, extending the same provisional release terms to the 25299.68 grams of gold jewelry as applied to the other seized gold, with the Bank Guarantee enhanced to Rs. 15 crores.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>