<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs Broker&#039;s Penalty Reduced to 25% u/s 114AA for Malafide Actions in Undeclared Goods Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69971</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty on Customs Broker u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - , there is enough material to substantiate the allegation of malafide against the Appellant and therefore, Section 114AA has been rightly invoked by the Department - However, the Appellant does not appear to be proportionate to his role in the attempted clearance of undeclared/ restricted goods - Penalty amount reduced to 25% - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 17:00:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 17:00:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs Broker&#039;s Penalty Reduced to 25% u/s 114AA for Malafide Actions in Undeclared Goods Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69971</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty on Customs Broker u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - , there is enough material to substantiate the allegation of malafide against the Appellant and therefore, Section 114AA has been rightly invoked by the Department - However, the Appellant does not appear to be proportionate to his role in the attempted clearance of undeclared/ restricted goods - Penalty amount reduced to 25% - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 17:00:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>