<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1058 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, holding that the agricultural land was held by the assessee in the status of HUF and the land purchased in the wife&#039;s name was eligible for exemption under section 54B of the Income Tax Act. The appellant successfully argued that the amended provisions of section 54B, applicable from 01.04.2013, include HUFs, making the exemption available to them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 08:25:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1058 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, holding that the agricultural land was held by the assessee in the status of HUF and the land purchased in the wife&#039;s name was eligible for exemption under section 54B of the Income Tax Act. The appellant successfully argued that the amended provisions of section 54B, applicable from 01.04.2013, include HUFs, making the exemption available to them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>