https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438223 Third parties could not reopen or intervene in a concluded writ issue after their special leave petitions had been disposed of by the Supreme Court without liberty to reagitate it; the recall and intervention applications were therefore not maintainable. In a court-monitored money-laundering probe, the monitoring judge had jurisdiction to issue directions in aid of the investigation, and the allegations of breach of natural justice or bias were not made out; the investigative direction was left intact. The Court also reiterated that a proposed person has no right to prior notice or hearing before investigative steps, including summons or interrogation, in an ongoing special-statute investigation. en-us Thu, 18 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 May 2023 08:23:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438223 Third parties could not reopen or intervene in a concluded writ issue after their special leave petitions had been disposed of by the Supreme Court without liberty to reagitate it; the recall and intervention applications were therefore not maintainable. In a court-monitored money-laundering probe, the monitoring judge had jurisdiction to issue directions in aid of the investigation, and the allegations of breach of natural justice or bias were not made out; the investigative direction was left intact. The Court also reiterated that a proposed person has no right to prior notice or hearing before investigative steps, including summons or interrogation, in an ongoing special-statute investigation. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 18 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438223