<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1027 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438220</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the taxation under Business Support Service but upholding the tax liability under Business Auxiliary Service. The matter was remanded to the original authority for quantifying the demand specifically under Business Auxiliary Service. The Tribunal stressed the importance of following due process and granting the appellant an opportunity for a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 08:23:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1027 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438220</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the taxation under Business Support Service but upholding the tax liability under Business Auxiliary Service. The matter was remanded to the original authority for quantifying the demand specifically under Business Auxiliary Service. The Tribunal stressed the importance of following due process and granting the appellant an opportunity for a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>