<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1020 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438213</link>
    <description>An adjudicating authority in remand proceedings cannot sustain a demand on a new classification that was not proposed in the show cause notice. Here, the remand was limited to determining the correct classification under Heading 5907 after considering Chapter Note 5(c) to Chapter 59, but the authority shifted the goods to Chapter 54 without notice to the assessee. That new basis was beyond the notice and beyond the remand directions, and the appellate authority merely affirmed it mechanically. The classification adopted in the impugned order was therefore unsustainable, and the demand founded on it was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1020 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438213</link>
      <description>An adjudicating authority in remand proceedings cannot sustain a demand on a new classification that was not proposed in the show cause notice. Here, the remand was limited to determining the correct classification under Heading 5907 after considering Chapter Note 5(c) to Chapter 59, but the authority shifted the goods to Chapter 54 without notice to the assessee. That new basis was beyond the notice and beyond the remand directions, and the appellate authority merely affirmed it mechanically. The classification adopted in the impugned order was therefore unsustainable, and the demand founded on it was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>