https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308046 The court found that the appellants complied with the previous court order in LPA No. 204/2022 by depositing the costs imposed and providing necessary details. The writ petition in W.P.(C) No.3852/2022 was dismissed, but the court set aside the order and remanded the petition for further hearing. The court emphasized the criteria for granting interim relief, requiring a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and proof of irreparable loss. The appeal was disposed of with these considerations, ensuring a fair process for interim relief. en-us Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 May 2023 22:14:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308046 The court found that the appellants complied with the previous court order in LPA No. 204/2022 by depositing the costs imposed and providing necessary details. The writ petition in W.P.(C) No.3852/2022 was dismissed, but the court set aside the order and remanded the petition for further hearing. The court emphasized the criteria for granting interim relief, requiring a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and proof of irreparable loss. The appeal was disposed of with these considerations, ensuring a fair process for interim relief. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308046