<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1018 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438211</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the penalty imposed under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act, holding that the simultaneous issuance of the notice under Section 129(1)(a) and the penalty order violated the principles of natural justice. The court found that no opportunity was given to the petitioner to be heard before the penalty was imposed, rendering the penalty order unsustainable. The matter was remanded to the Joint Commissioner for reconsideration in accordance with statutory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1018 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438211</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the penalty imposed under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act, holding that the simultaneous issuance of the notice under Section 129(1)(a) and the penalty order violated the principles of natural justice. The court found that no opportunity was given to the petitioner to be heard before the penalty was imposed, rendering the penalty order unsustainable. The matter was remanded to the Joint Commissioner for reconsideration in accordance with statutory requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>