<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1016 - PATIALA HOUSE COURTS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438209</link>
    <description>The Patiala House Courts dismissed the department&#039;s application seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the accused. The court examined five bail conditions: passport deposit, prior intimation before leaving NCR, non-engagement in similar offences, cooperation in investigation, and departmental refund. The court found no willful violation of passport-related conditions, noting only one instance of failure to provide prior intimation due to medical emergency warranted a warning. The accused cooperated with investigation by appearing when summoned and providing statements. No evidence showed violation of refund conditions or engagement in similar offences post-bail. The department failed to establish cogent grounds for bail cancellation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1016 - PATIALA HOUSE COURTS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438209</link>
      <description>The Patiala House Courts dismissed the department&#039;s application seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the accused. The court examined five bail conditions: passport deposit, prior intimation before leaving NCR, non-engagement in similar offences, cooperation in investigation, and departmental refund. The court found no willful violation of passport-related conditions, noting only one instance of failure to provide prior intimation due to medical emergency warranted a warning. The accused cooperated with investigation by appearing when summoned and providing statements. No evidence showed violation of refund conditions or engagement in similar offences post-bail. The department failed to establish cogent grounds for bail cancellation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>