<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1006 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438199</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, denying the assessee exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act due to owning multiple residential houses, making them ineligible for the exemption. The Tribunal upheld that if the assessee owns more than one residential house at the time of the asset transfer, the deduction under Section 54F cannot be availed, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1006 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438199</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, denying the assessee exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act due to owning multiple residential houses, making them ineligible for the exemption. The Tribunal upheld that if the assessee owns more than one residential house at the time of the asset transfer, the deduction under Section 54F cannot be availed, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>