<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1004 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438197</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by upholding the addition of Rs. 5,00,000 under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act. However, the higher tax rate specified in Section 115BBE was not applied retrospectively, directing the Assessing Officer to tax the addition at the normal rate applicable before the amendment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 09:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1004 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438197</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by upholding the addition of Rs. 5,00,000 under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act. However, the higher tax rate specified in Section 115BBE was not applied retrospectively, directing the Assessing Officer to tax the addition at the normal rate applicable before the amendment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>