<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 999 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438192</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) to adjudicate the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in accordance with the law and deleted the addition of Rs. 64,00,000/- as unexplained credits. Other arguments regarding the validity of reassessment and cross-examination were rendered academic and infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 09:12:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 999 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438192</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) to adjudicate the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in accordance with the law and deleted the addition of Rs. 64,00,000/- as unexplained credits. Other arguments regarding the validity of reassessment and cross-examination were rendered academic and infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>