<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 997 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438190</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of a cash payment of Rs. 10,00,000 under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the assessee failed to prove that the expenditure was solely for business purposes. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) affirmed this decision, stating the payment did not qualify for any exemptions and lacked sufficient evidence of being business-related. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming the disallowance of the cash payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 09:12:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 997 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438190</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of a cash payment of Rs. 10,00,000 under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the assessee failed to prove that the expenditure was solely for business purposes. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) affirmed this decision, stating the payment did not qualify for any exemptions and lacked sufficient evidence of being business-related. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming the disallowance of the cash payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>