<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 990 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438183</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Sections 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, as the revenue failed to provide sufficient evidence of the appellant&#039;s involvement in the mis-declaration and undervaluation of import consignments. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned, granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 990 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438183</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Sections 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, as the revenue failed to provide sufficient evidence of the appellant&#039;s involvement in the mis-declaration and undervaluation of import consignments. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned, granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>