<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 987 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438180</link>
    <description>Extra high tension cables imported for carrying 132 KV current were treated as covered by Notification No. 12/2012-Customs dated 17.03.2012. The Tribunal relied on an earlier decision involving identical goods, which had already held that such cables fell within the exemption entry. Following that binding view, it found no infirmity in the order granting exemption and upheld the benefit for the importer, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 987 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438180</link>
      <description>Extra high tension cables imported for carrying 132 KV current were treated as covered by Notification No. 12/2012-Customs dated 17.03.2012. The Tribunal relied on an earlier decision involving identical goods, which had already held that such cables fell within the exemption entry. Following that binding view, it found no infirmity in the order granting exemption and upheld the benefit for the importer, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>