<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 985 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438178</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the statutory provisions under the SEBI Act and SCRA provide a robust mechanism for protecting investor interests. SEBI and BSE have taken measures to ensure transparency and fairness in the delisting process, with an appeal mechanism available for aggrieved investors. The court found that existing legal frameworks adequately protect investor interests, and no further orders were necessary, disposing of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 985 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438178</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the statutory provisions under the SEBI Act and SCRA provide a robust mechanism for protecting investor interests. SEBI and BSE have taken measures to ensure transparency and fairness in the delisting process, with an appeal mechanism available for aggrieved investors. The court found that existing legal frameworks adequately protect investor interests, and no further orders were necessary, disposing of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>