<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 974 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438167</link>
    <description>The Appellant, a security services provider, faced a demand for unpaid Service Tax for 2006-07 to 2010-11. After opting for the Sabka Vishwas Scheme and pre-depositing an amount, a dispute arose over further demand under SVLDRS-2. The Appellant contested penalties imposed, leading to the penalties being set aside. No additional amount was deemed recoverable, and no refund accrued to the Appellant. The Appeal was disposed of with this outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 09:11:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 974 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438167</link>
      <description>The Appellant, a security services provider, faced a demand for unpaid Service Tax for 2006-07 to 2010-11. After opting for the Sabka Vishwas Scheme and pre-depositing an amount, a dispute arose over further demand under SVLDRS-2. The Appellant contested penalties imposed, leading to the penalties being set aside. No additional amount was deemed recoverable, and no refund accrued to the Appellant. The Appeal was disposed of with this outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>