<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1412 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308030</link>
    <description>Section 41D of the Code of Criminal Procedure confers only a limited right on an arrested person to meet counsel during interrogation, and does not create an entitlement to the continuous presence of an advocate throughout questioning; on the stated facts, the broader order allowing such presence was held unsustainable. The court also addressed medical examination in custody, recognising the need for an arrested person to be examined and for reliable medical material to be available for remand consideration. The direction to take the accused to a specific hospital was modified, with specialist examination arrangements substituted so the Special Court could assess remand on an independent medical report.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 09:10:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1412 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308030</link>
      <description>Section 41D of the Code of Criminal Procedure confers only a limited right on an arrested person to meet counsel during interrogation, and does not create an entitlement to the continuous presence of an advocate throughout questioning; on the stated facts, the broader order allowing such presence was held unsustainable. The court also addressed medical examination in custody, recognising the need for an arrested person to be examined and for reliable medical material to be available for remand consideration. The direction to take the accused to a specific hospital was modified, with specialist examination arrangements substituted so the Special Court could assess remand on an independent medical report.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>