https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308027 The Court found the respondent's attachment of the appellant's bank account, despite an interim order directing against coercive recovery, to be a violation. The respondent was instructed to lift the attachment immediately and report compliance at the next hearing. The judgment underscored the importance of adhering to court orders and respecting interim directions, emphasizing that actions contrary to court orders, even if claimed to be on hold, constitute breaches. The decision highlighted the gravity of such violations and the imperative of strict compliance with judicial directives to uphold the integrity of legal proceedings. en-us Wed, 21 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 May 2023 09:10:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308027 The Court found the respondent's attachment of the appellant's bank account, despite an interim order directing against coercive recovery, to be a violation. The respondent was instructed to lift the attachment immediately and report compliance at the next hearing. The judgment underscored the importance of adhering to court orders and respecting interim directions, emphasizing that actions contrary to court orders, even if claimed to be on hold, constitute breaches. The decision highlighted the gravity of such violations and the imperative of strict compliance with judicial directives to uphold the integrity of legal proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 21 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308027