<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 200 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32817</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Service Tax in two separate cases, citing the judgment in Majestic Mobikes (P.) Ltd. The Tribunal found that penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, were not justified when service tax was paid before the issuance of show-cause notices. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals and provided any necessary relief to the appellants in both cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 200 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32817</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Service Tax in two separate cases, citing the judgment in Majestic Mobikes (P.) Ltd. The Tribunal found that penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, were not justified when service tax was paid before the issuance of show-cause notices. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals and provided any necessary relief to the appellants in both cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>