<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (1) TMI 102 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308025</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s order and restored the Presidency Magistrate&#039;s decision with modifications. It directed joint trials for certain accused for conspiracy and selected offenses, separate trials for other accused for conspiracy and selected offenses, and separate trials for specific transactions. The Court emphasized the importance of fair judicial discretion in framing charges and conducting trials for both prosecution and defense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (1) TMI 102 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308025</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s order and restored the Presidency Magistrate&#039;s decision with modifications. It directed joint trials for certain accused for conspiracy and selected offenses, separate trials for other accused for conspiracy and selected offenses, and separate trials for specific transactions. The Court emphasized the importance of fair judicial discretion in framing charges and conducting trials for both prosecution and defense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>