<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 116 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32814</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that services rendered by overseas agents were not taxable before 18.4.06, as they were considered offshore services. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, and the issue of limitation was not addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 116 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32814</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that services rendered by overseas agents were not taxable before 18.4.06, as they were considered offshore services. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, and the issue of limitation was not addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>