<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 115 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32813</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Cash Management Services were not taxable under Banking and other financial services during the period in question (01.07.2003 to 31.03.2005). As such, the appellant&#039;s services were correctly classified as Cash Management Services and not Business Auxiliary Services. Therefore, the demand for service tax and penalties was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 115 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32813</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Cash Management Services were not taxable under Banking and other financial services during the period in question (01.07.2003 to 31.03.2005). As such, the appellant&#039;s services were correctly classified as Cash Management Services and not Business Auxiliary Services. Therefore, the demand for service tax and penalties was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>