https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438158 The court dismissed the petition challenging the detention of goods during transportation, emphasizing the need to exhaust the statutory remedy of appeal before seeking extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court found that interference at the initial stage might not be appropriate, considering the availability of a statutory remedy. The petitioner was advised to pursue their statutory remedies for a more effective resolution, given the disputed facts and issues surrounding the case. en-us Wed, 03 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 May 2023 13:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438158 The court dismissed the petition challenging the detention of goods during transportation, emphasizing the need to exhaust the statutory remedy of appeal before seeking extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court found that interference at the initial stage might not be appropriate, considering the availability of a statutory remedy. The petitioner was advised to pursue their statutory remedies for a more effective resolution, given the disputed facts and issues surrounding the case. Case-Laws GST Wed, 03 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438158