<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 955 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438148</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of a Rs. 15 crore addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the necessity of incriminating material for assessments under section 153A. The judgment highlighted that additions must be based on material collected during a search, and in this case, the addition lacked such incriminating evidence. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the decision to delete the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 09:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 955 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438148</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of a Rs. 15 crore addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the necessity of incriminating material for assessments under section 153A. The judgment highlighted that additions must be based on material collected during a search, and in this case, the addition lacked such incriminating evidence. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the decision to delete the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>