<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 84 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32811</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed based on the principle that once sales tax is paid on goods, no further tax should be collected from intermediaries. The decision aligned with previous Tribunal rulings and was not contested by the revenue, leading to the dismissal of the demand of service tax under Business Auxiliary Services (BAS) and Repair and Maintenance Service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 84 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32811</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed based on the principle that once sales tax is paid on goods, no further tax should be collected from intermediaries. The decision aligned with previous Tribunal rulings and was not contested by the revenue, leading to the dismissal of the demand of service tax under Business Auxiliary Services (BAS) and Repair and Maintenance Service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>