https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438128 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Competition Commission of India's findings that OP-7 and its Director were guilty of engaging in anti-competitive conduct, specifically bid-rigging and cartelization, in violation of Sections 3(3)(c) and 3(3)(d) read with Section 3(1) of the Competition Act, 2002. The Commission's order and the penalties imposed on OP-7 and its Director were affirmed, rejecting the Appellant's arguments and evidence presented in their defense. en-us Tue, 23 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 May 2023 09:19:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438128 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Competition Commission of India's findings that OP-7 and its Director were guilty of engaging in anti-competitive conduct, specifically bid-rigging and cartelization, in violation of Sections 3(3)(c) and 3(3)(d) read with Section 3(1) of the Competition Act, 2002. The Commission's order and the penalties imposed on OP-7 and its Director were affirmed, rejecting the Appellant's arguments and evidence presented in their defense. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 23 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438128