https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308022 The court dismissed the petition seeking mandamus for the investigating agency to procure documents from South Africa, emphasizing that the accused cannot dictate the investigation process or choose the investigating agency. The judgment clarified that the investigating agency is responsible for collecting evidence, and court intervention based on the accused's requests is unnecessary. Citing legal precedents, the court concluded that the petitioner's request was misconceived, as the investigating agency will gather relevant evidence during the investigation, and the defense of an accused cannot be determined through a petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. en-us Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 May 2023 21:46:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308022 The court dismissed the petition seeking mandamus for the investigating agency to procure documents from South Africa, emphasizing that the accused cannot dictate the investigation process or choose the investigating agency. The judgment clarified that the investigating agency is responsible for collecting evidence, and court intervention based on the accused's requests is unnecessary. Citing legal precedents, the court concluded that the petitioner's request was misconceived, as the investigating agency will gather relevant evidence during the investigation, and the defense of an accused cannot be determined through a petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308022