<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1618 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308017</link>
    <description>The Chhattisgarh HC dismissed an appeal challenging a CESTAT order under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Commissioner&#039;s findings, noting insufficiency of evidence in the Revenue&#039;s case. The appeal was dismissed in limine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 21:45:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1618 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308017</link>
      <description>The Chhattisgarh HC dismissed an appeal challenging a CESTAT order under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Commissioner&#039;s findings, noting insufficiency of evidence in the Revenue&#039;s case. The appeal was dismissed in limine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>