<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 276 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32807</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed on the Assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the Assessee did not furnish inaccurate particulars of income, as all necessary details were provided during the assessment proceedings, leading to the conclusion that there was no concealment of income. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose and affirming the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 276 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32807</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed on the Assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the Assessee did not furnish inaccurate particulars of income, as all necessary details were provided during the assessment proceedings, leading to the conclusion that there was no concealment of income. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose and affirming the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>