<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 1326 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308007</link>
    <description>A corrigendum may be used only to correct clerical, typographical or accidental mistakes. Where it changes the substance of the original notification by removing one nominated municipal member and substituting another, it is not a mere correction but a substantive alteration. Such use of a corrigendum cannot defeat vested rights or bypass the prescribed procedure for removal. The stated principles on correction of accidental errors therefore did not authorise withdrawal of the original nomination and conferment of the office on another person; the corrigendum was treated as illegal insofar as it affected the existing nominee&#039;s rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 12:59:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 1326 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308007</link>
      <description>A corrigendum may be used only to correct clerical, typographical or accidental mistakes. Where it changes the substance of the original notification by removing one nominated municipal member and substituting another, it is not a mere correction but a substantive alteration. Such use of a corrigendum cannot defeat vested rights or bypass the prescribed procedure for removal. The stated principles on correction of accidental errors therefore did not authorise withdrawal of the original nomination and conferment of the office on another person; the corrigendum was treated as illegal insofar as it affected the existing nominee&#039;s rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>