<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 838 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308006</link>
    <description>The club was recognised as entitled to conduct its card room for rummy with stakes, including the syndicate or thirteen-card game, and police authorities were not permitted to obstruct that activity. At the same time, police retained liberty to enter the premises to verify compliance and to take action if games other than rummy with stakes were being played. The clarification also left intact the police&#039;s power to proceed in respect of cases already registered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 12:58:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 838 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308006</link>
      <description>The club was recognised as entitled to conduct its card room for rummy with stakes, including the syndicate or thirteen-card game, and police authorities were not permitted to obstruct that activity. At the same time, police retained liberty to enter the premises to verify compliance and to take action if games other than rummy with stakes were being played. The clarification also left intact the police&#039;s power to proceed in respect of cases already registered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>